"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks:
>
>First, thank you people for the idea to attempt to reconstruct
>the destroyed P350 C: partition by using the backup FAT. I didnt
>do it yet, but as far as I saw from testing software, the backup
>FAT seems to have the data intact. It worth a shot..
>
>But I have a question: I was directed to Simtel to get a DOS utility
>that will do it. Thing is, that C: also had Windows 95 on it
>as well as DR-DOS 7.02 and MS-DOS 6.22. Now, DR-DOS and MS-DOS do
>not do any problem. But I am afraid that Windows might. The problem
>is the LFN. Will the DOS based FAT restoration from backup utilities
>will work correctly, although the LFN that Windows putted all over the
>disk?
Filenames, short or long, are not stored in the FATs. They live in
the directories. FATs just contain pointers to clusters.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
