At 12:33 AM 1/5/00 -0800, you wrote:
>I dont understand why survpc folks would prefer a progman replacement
>that had the same philosophy as win 95: offer more features at the price
>of a program that is less efficient and more prone to the dread GPFs
>than progman itself.
>
>Could someone explain the appeal?
Well, given that it's NOT as fast and stable as the original progman.ini,
there IS no appeal. Conceptually, it offered easier file handling, easier
desktop management, and more user configurable appearance. Personally
I've never liked the stuff cluttering my desktop, but the w9x style
interface is less cluttered than the w3x interface just the same. I like
to have NO icons, just a couple popup menus to access all, and some nice
art to look at when I'm between programs.
Still, from my brief excursion with Calmira, I'd say that if you have the
resources to run it, you don't need to because you can run the 32 bit w9x
instead. It's tough to find w3x software. If yer gonna run windows, you
might as well run the newest your hardware can, and be free to access all
the neato stuff that is available out there.
Pippi sez "two braids down for calmira".
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
