That probably includes the browser. I have I.E. 3.0 zipped onto 3 -1.44MB floppies. On 8 Apr 00, at 22:44, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: > Four blank 1.44 Floppy Disks for a dialer? No thanks. I'm not > interested in bloatware. A program of this size would be too > resource-hungry even if it included a graphics browser with lots > of bells and whistles. I suppose it is just typical Gate$ware, > programmed for the purpose of slowing down my computer in order > to try to have me to believe that it is time to upgrade my system. > I'm not going to fall for it. > > Sam Heywood To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Win... Bjorn Simonsen
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Carl Wheeley
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Ray Greene
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Dale Mentzer
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Dale Mentzer
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Ray Greene
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Ron Clarke
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with WinSock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Dale Mentzer
- Re: [SURVPC] Need help with Winsock TCP/IP, Windows 3.1 Samuel W. Heywood
