You have been rude, insensitive and inconsiderate.  To me, and to the
list.  We don't need the bandwidth you wasted bitching an old song and I
did nothing wrong and didn't deserve the scolding.  Just to be spiteful
I've not clipped a thing.  Besides, maybe after sleeping it off you've
forgotten just how ignorant you were.  You owe me and others an
apology.  Took me several days to calm down enough to a: not do this on
list and b: not swear and rant all over you.
It's just too bad you're tired of virus warnings and tired of MS windows
discussions, it's here, it's staying, and you'll have to get over it.  When
you develop an operating system even idiots can use while they get their
WORK done, then I'll listen to you.  Till then, you and I are just users.



At 04:19 PM 5/5/00 +0100, you wrote:
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Recieved the following letter from one of my ISPs and the link below from a
> >friend, this virus is real and verifiable.  Ananova.com even reports it!
> >>http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/05/04/iloveyou.01/index.html
>
>I'm really sick and tired of these virus warnings every other month.
>A new virus? So what?! I don't care! I use a SurvPC WITHOUT Windows.
>It serves all the a*sholes right if they get f*cked in the a*s with a virus.
>Why do they use Windows?! Who punishes a private user to buy this or that
>software? The own stupidity! According to the hungarian proverb "the stupid
>should die". So I don't feel sorry for the idiots that cry and whine now.
>It's time to obtain a brain! (And don't forget to switch it on.)
>
>This is the easily computable result if the world allowes one company
>to hold the whole PC market of BOTH OS AND APPLICATION SOFTWARE in its
>hand.
>
>Part of this problem is - beside other doubtful business practices -
>CORRUPCY. Unfortunately, outside of the "inner circle" it is not very known
>that MS often pays a "buyer's benefit" to top IT managers or other decision
>makers in charge of software purchase. Depending on the volume of purchase
>it can be up to 25%. I understand the human weakness, it's not easy to
>resist if you have to make a decision about update or system change in
>value of let's say 300 megabucks, and somebody whispers the magic words
>into your ear:"In case of the right decision we could provide a deduction
>of 20% to your company and of course we would appreciate your efforts on a
>similar level". Or did you believe that companies or even gov. agencies buy MS
>software because of its widely known quality? Of course, some simply
>structured people still believe, institutional users would buy software at
>the corner, where they do. The difference however, will be paid, in fact,
>at the computer shop at the corner, by those braindead private users who now
>also whine about "Iloveyou". Who told them to use Outlook?! Pegasusu Mail
>costs  the same, Lotus' mailprogram is free for private use, Yarn is free
>(even for Windows), and there are many others for an affordable price.
>
>It's not easy to defeat a "denial of service" attack. However, defeating a
>virus whose aim is getting down computer systems worldwide as many as
>possible while destroying their data, should not be a challange for a
>normally equipped brain. The name of the pill is DIVERSITY!
>
>Operating systems FREE FOR BUSINESS AND PRIVATE USE:
>LINUX, FREEBSD, NETBSD, OPENBSD
>
>FREE FOR PRIVATE USE ONLY:
>SCO UNIX, SOLARIS
>
>Office Packages:
>STAROFFICE (Free for both business and private use, runs on nearly all Unix
>derivates and Windows)
>APPLIXWARE (reasonable price, runs on Unix & Linux)
>
>Of course, these are just a couple of examples, the list could be continued
>with some other more or less market-ready products.
>
>BTW, in forseeable future I plan to change my internet-online activities
>for OBERON. Or has anybody ever heard of a virus against OBERON?
>
>--
>Tibor Mocsar
>
>To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
>Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
>More info can be found at;
>http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

bye,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(\
Yolanda ,,,,,,,,,,\\_/(\
UIN 4898262,,,..,,,Q Q \)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=(_T_)=
http://members.home.net/pippi5
{.. /  .-.. --- ...- . /  -... ..- -. -. .. . ...  .-.-.- } A+
Inertia. It's not just an object at rest tends to stay at rest; it's
also an object in motion tends to stay in motion.

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to