On Sunday September 17, 2000, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:59:35 -0700 Randy Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is hard for me to understand. What's the connection
> > between using a restorable HD image for convenience and
> > security, and having a person use your machine for criminal
> > purposes? And how was the caf� held responsible for what a
> > client did with a rented machine? Does AT&T get in trouble
> > every time someone commits fraud using a rented telephone?
>
> That is just a legal question. You already know the answer.
> The answer is simply that the law is unfair.
Actually, I'm quite unaware of the legal situation. I work
in a cybercaf� too, where no customers are registered or
monitored in any way. As far as I know, all other caf�s in
this city work the same way. My surprise is genuine, and my
questions are sincere.
R.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
