On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:54:43 +0000, Heimo Claasen wrote:

> (*) Precisely because POP3 is cheaper for ISPs, and was meant to save
> storage volume and bandwidth for *them*; while IMAP indeed is devised to
> have the housekeeping done at the server.

This may explain why the tech I talked with said something cryptic about
"We may give IMAP4 services when cable modems starts to be availble,
since its more fitting then POP3 in these cases.". He didnt want to explain
what exactly he means, again, due to "secured internal company information
that is not for the public."

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to