On 14 Dec 2000, at 22:31, Alessio Palma wrote:
<SNIP>
> > though, so I can't recommend that. A shell account is
> > probably going to be required if you are planning to go on-line, too.
> >
> > Equipment was AT&T 6300, 4.77MHz processor with a NE2000-
> > compatible 10-Base-2 NIC. Software used was NCSA telnet, and
>
> TCP/IP eats memory, how much memory AT&T 6300 own?
> Did you tried the MS TCP/IP or K9AQ stack in your machine?
Those AT&T 6300's were as short on memory as they were long on
weight - they had 640KB, no more, when the "expansion kit" was
added in, and weight about 20kg.
Never tried the MS TCP/IP stack or K9AQ stack, I'm afraid. The ODIPKT
interface was our selection here, and we stuck with it. Still have a number of
machines running it, as I mentioned in my earlier post.
Anthony J. Albert
==============================================================
Anthony J. Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems and Software Support Specialist Postmaster
Computer Services - University of Maine, Presque Isle
"We took risks. We knew we took them. Things have come out against
us. We have no cause for complaint." - Explorer Robert Scott, found in
his diary after his party froze to death in Antarctica.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
