> Sure, this can be done, and it can work quite well. I've personally
> run TCP/IP and IPX simultaneously on the same machine, over
> Ethernet networks, and had performance that was good enough to
> run the NCSA terminal emulator to a remote site with no problems.
> I have had problems running it over anthing faster than a 14.4
> modem,
You miss info about protocol used with your modem. SLIP CSLIP or PPP with
compressed or uncompressed packets? This could do the difference and reduce
to 9600 or less your baud rate. Surely you used SLIP, which practically do
"nothing". Try you configuration with CSLIP or PPP at 14.4K.
> though, so I can't recommend that. A shell account is
> probably going to be required if you are planning to go on-line, too.
>
> Equipment was AT&T 6300, 4.77MHz processor with a NE2000-
> compatible 10-Base-2 NIC. Software used was NCSA telnet, and
TCP/IP eats memory, how much memory AT&T 6300 own?
Did you tried the MS TCP/IP or K9AQ stack in your machine?
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
