Robert Wittig wrote: > before it even got into court. It's not a matter of having anyone > assign damages, its a matter of having to hire and pay for counsel, > and having your life thrown into a shambles, and Microsoft's lawyers > know that. Of course, I'm sure you have tricks up your sleeve that > their team of investigators and elite legal hired guns never saw > before.<g> Well yeah. Like I said, I dont expect anyone with significant assets to do this. But there are plenty of volunteers, whose income and assets are trivial, and who, BTW, use heritage, donated, scrounged, PCs that otherwise would be in the dumpster... and who hang out on lists like this....
Who could do exactly what I say, staff a shell to do what we see polluters on this planet have always done to hide their own rectal orfices from legal problems, which is to say, do things in the name of, and for the sake of an _organization_, which itself has no asset base large enough to appeal to lawyers. If the organization has no money, and the management has no money, Microsoft is the one that will get scrod. (Pluperfect subjunctive) :) To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
