L.D.,

> I will repeat what I said on the Arachne list, and I would
appreciate it
> if some of you might pass the word.  I have not sent anyone any
viruses.
>
> If people would look up what is written about at least one of
the newest
> Dozerwarez viruses, not only can the piece of snit software
harvest
> e-dresses from address books and saved html pages, it also has
upgraded
> so that the From: can be forged and one of those harvested
e-dresses
> blamed for the e-mail.

First, let me say that I was not one of the people who accused
you of sending anyone virii, nor did I receive any that appeared
to be from you.

Second, if you are referring to one of the 'Gibe' incarnations,
you are correct, the virus does forge several parts of the
header, most of the first 2 lines (except for the enclosed DNS),
and also the last three lines, including the now famous '(HELO
pfuckie)' signature entry.

> I use Arachne and only Arachne for processing e-mail.
>
> Attachments to Arachne do NOT happen secretly, nor is mail sent
> secretly.

I do not know how Arachne functions, but it does not matter much,
relative to this particular virus, because it is hardcoded to
work specifically with Outlook/OE programs, and wouldn't know
what to do with another mail client, unless the designers had
hijacked Microsoft's source code, and used it unaltered. Of
course, that would not stop it from dropping other parts of its
payload in the infected computer, where those parts were
applicable to the OS the computer was running, just from using
the mail client to spread itself.

> I cannot even *receive* e-mail with viruses attached; my ISP
has Amavis
> in place, and when an infected e-mail is sent to me it is sent
to the
> bit bucket and I simply get a notice that e-mail containing
such and
> such a virus was sent to me by so and so.
>
> If I attempt to include or attach a virus to outgoing e-mail,
it is
> *stopped* by my ISP.

This presumes that your ISP's (and - or your) virus definitions
are up-to-date. The Gibe virus was either self-mutating, or there
were at least three (that I know of) variations circulating
within the past several days, none of which had the same
heuristic recognition pattern, which means that updated virus
definitions were being out-dated by new strains of the virus
within a matter of hours. This was fairly easy to spot, since the
body of the letter had not changed, except for the reference to
the attachment, which had also been renamed.

> It even stopped my initial reply to Steven's
> message because I had quoted the small amount of UUE encoded
message he
> had attached.

That small amount of UUD encoded might have been the virus, or
the part of the virus that your ISP's AV software bases
recognition on.

> Anyone who believes they got infected e-mail from me is invited
to tell
> *me* and not the world in general ... and, if possible, they
should
> forward full headers at least, or the message in zipped format
password
> protected so it can get past the Amavis virus firewall.

I agree with you that a person should be notified privately, but
it is also reasonable for a virus recipient who recognises the
apparent sender as being a member of a particular list, to warn
the list, in case other members have received similar emails,
which they have not yet opened, hopefully with an attention
getting tag in the header, so that it will be read first.

As far as forwarding full headers and all that stuff, I do not
mess with any of that, especially at the 'getting out the
warning' stage. I have a stock message I send people who
inadvertently send me virii (since I run a virus list, a lot of
my friends and associates deliberately send me virii as well)
telling them their machine is infected, what virus it is infected
with, and directing them to the Trend Micro free virus-check
page, in case they do not have a current subscription to their
own AV service.

Being incorrectly accused of having disseminated a virus might be
a blow to one's ego... but it is only a temporary blow, since in
very short order the facts come out, as in the case of a virus
having the capability to forge headers.

-wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/
 to master others is nothing.
 to master yourself is something.
.

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to