Jerry,

Lest anyone get the wrong idea:  your monitor
is a 25-line monitor -- it just has old-timers
disease.

This is a common enough problem with aging
monitors.  The only variation on this theme
that I've seen is the rare case where such a
monitor will show this behavior on one video
card, but not another.

If you plug it into another machine and the
view looks the same, then you have a repair
scenario.  If it looks normal on another card,
you may still need it repaired, but the signal
is within acceptable limits for this device.

Not all video card outputs are created equal,
so you may be able to use that to advantage.

~~Garry
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry J. Haumberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [SURVPC] Workaround for 24-line Monitor?


> On 2002-03-24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Heimo Claasen> said:
>
>    >Jerry - ae you sure that it's the _first_ line which is eaten away ?
>    >The problem reminds me of some early "terminals" (especially of the
>    >IBM type) which had line 25 "rese3rved" for "system services" over a
>    >specific feed.
>
>    >(Those monitors had more, and probably specific, pins too on the
>    >plug of their - fixed - connector wire, compared to the usual TTL
>    >connector.)
>
> Let me describe what happens a bit more closely...
>
> If, for example, the top line of the screen displays a header, time,
> and date (whatever, it doesn't matter) and is stationary while the
> rest of the screen scrolls below, the *twenty-fifth* line will appear
> on top of line one... and *then* that top line becomes elongated,
> upside down *and* reversed... so line one and "twenty-five" are
> combined in this mixed up fashion.  The first line becomes elongated
> and reversed -- with a normal-print 25th line riding over number one.
>
> I suspect, as you might be thinking, that this monitor was used with
> some special application/terminal system.  None of the equipment with
> this system, however, is made by IBM.  And so I wonder whether or not
> a special driver was required to operate/alter this "CompuAdd" monitor,
> which is now lost.
>
> Jerry... on his COMPAQ PORTABLE II -- #4 | My laptop computer's a
> *****    14.4kbps/42MB HD/640k RAM/8 MHz | Tandy TRS-80 Model 100
>
> Net-Tamer V 1.11.2X - Registered
>

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to