"Fred A. Miller" wrote:
>
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/244979.asp
Nice article, but can someone please explain why SuSE is getting such a
bad rap as being the "least effective Linux." I realize that for this
testing they used version 5.3 not 6.0, but why are the reports so bad?
I've always considered SuSE technically superior, but everything lately
seems to be disagreeing with this?
--
TIA,
Dave C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.cybernex.net/~pepermil/
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
