Well, I just got an unexpected and pleasant reply from an authoritative
source.

"You need to compile in SOCAL firmware, which one has to grab
from Solaris driver "

And that is pretty much the problem. Apparently without that piece the socal
driver does not work. Sun never released permission to include it in the
distribution.

Regards

Raoul Volpe
Phone (877) 44 SOL EX (Toll Free)
Phone +001 407 323 1668 (outside US)
Fax  +001 586 816 7086
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.solarisexpert.com <http://www.solarisexpert.com/>


-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Picciano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:11 PM
To: SuSE SPARC LIST
Cc: Solarisexpert.com; Matthias Schulz
Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] FC-AL: FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP
packet on socal0 port A


Hello!

Your problem is due to architecture-dependent configuration and source files
in the Linux distribution.  This is exactly the behavior I - and others -
have now seen on sun4m architecture using the soc, pluto and fcal modules.
It walks and talks like an IRQ error.  The good news (if we can spin it a
little!) is that the compile _does_ work on other architectures, so there's
hope...

The following is thanks to Matthias Schulz - on this list:

'in the directory /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc/kernel there are at
least different files for sun4m and sun4d architecture. One of the
files deals with interrupts.'

I think we can safely surmise that Jakub Jelinek - who authored the soc
modules and these architecture files - did most of his work on a
newer-architecture machine.  We've tried to email him, but as yet no reply.
Matthias has gotten the soc module working, on a new Linux kernel compile,
on a (E1000?).

One of you guys much more brilliant than me would probably be able to figure
out, and correct this file, for sun4m, in an hour.  For the time being,
though, I am completely dead in the water regarding use of my SS10 with a
fibre interface...

Any help??

Lou Picciano

> I have tried them all:
>
> I used the both the 2.2.20 and the 2.4.18 kernel (which I had to compile
> myself since there is no downloadable version anywhere).
>
> I insmod fc4 first and socal righ after (I have also tried modprobe fcal)
>
> This is what  get on console
>
> socal.c: SOC+ driver v1.1 9/Feb/99 Jakub Jelinek ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port A
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port B
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port A
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port B
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port A
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port B
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port A
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port B
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port A
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port B
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port A
> FC: Cannot enque FLOGI/REPORT_MAP packet on socal0 port B
>
> This is the output of "lsmod"
>
> socal                   6824   0  (autoclean) (unused)
> fc4                    11336   0  [socal]
>
> The machine is an E5000 attache to an A5000 array. Boot channels are
> attached to the array from the built-in SOC+ ports of the I/O board.
>
> ANY IDEAS ? What is the relationship between the drivers. FC4 sets up the
> loop (that was my understanding, but why is it not seeing anything) ?
>
> RV
>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Volpe;Raoul;;Mr.
FN:Raoul Volpe
ORG:SolariseXpert
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(877) 44 SOLEX
TEL;WORK;FAX:(586) 816-7086
ADR;WORK:;;8142 Fan Palm way;Kissimmee;FL;34747;United States of America
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:8142 Fan Palm way=0D=0AKissimmee, FL 34747=0D=0AUnited States of America
URL;WORK:http://www.solarisexpert.com
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020406T120228Z
END:VCARD

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to