>> Note: SPARC32 support is extremely limited and not entirely supported at >> this time.
> Twin processor sparc 20s look like a bit of a non starter then. While it is true that UP is safer on sparc32, I can't really complain. This box is a master DNS for a few domains and serves as a resolver for about 300 clients with heavy internet use plus light use with apache/ssl/squirrelmail/imap. Ingo <boast> Linux otto 2.4.20-2.31sparcsmp #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 17:22:59 EDT 2003 sparc unknown 8:00pm up 83 days, 8:16, 2 users, load average: 0.24, 0.17, 0.11 Aurora SPARC Project release 1.0 (Ansel) Based on Red Hat Linux 7.X cpu : Texas Instruments, Inc. - SuperSparc-(II) fpu : SuperSparc on-chip FPU promlib : Version 3 Revision 2 prom : 2.22 type : sun4m ncpus probed : 2 ncpus active : 2 Cpu0Bogo : 59.80 Cpu1Bogo : 59.80 MMU type : TI Viking/MXCC contexts : 65536 nocache total : 2097152 nocache used : 598528 CPU0 : online CPU1 : online </boast> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
