On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:58:24AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 12 June 2006 08:53, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > I would do the rename since built-in suspend *will* confuse users (it > > confused > > me at first time even that I use linux for several years) and renaming is > > easier now than when suspend.sf.net stuff becomes more popular (like after > > 2.6.17 is released). > > I tend to agree. It may be a problem for SUSE (suspend has been shipped in > 10.1), but generally it's better not to confuse anyone. ;-)
no, the suspend package deliberately _only_ contains s2ram, no other tools (yet) since the 10.1 kernel is not uswsusp-enabled anyway. > Stefan, would you agree with changing the name of "suspend" to "s2disk"? Yes, but remember that the Gnome/HAL crowd has recently decided that the whole world must now call suspend to ram "suspend" and suspend to disk "hibernate", since this is apparently the way windows does it. I won't comment on that... :-) Go ahead, rename it to s2disk. -- Stefan Seyfried | "Please, just tell people QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | to use KDE." SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
