On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:30:49PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > i finally tested it and it seems to work.
> > 
> > no, it didn't. But i fixed it. The placement of platform_finish() is
> > non-intuitive :-)
> > 
> > Also, moved to one ioctl with a parameter. If the style / ioctl design is
> > ok, could we push this ASAP? It is pretty important to me to be able to 
> > test this further :-)
> > 
> > I'll also clean up the userspace part (add a configuration variable so once
> > can decide between "platform", "shutdown", maybe even "reboot", but that can
> > still be done once the kernel part is pushed.
> > 
> > This is for the kernel:
> > 
> > Add an ioctl to user.c so that uswsusp can suspend correctly using the
> > pm_ops methods.
> > 
> > From: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Ack, can you push it to -mm?

I'll do it. I did not get to writing the documentation, so let's hope Andrew
will let this one still slip in without :-)
-- 
Stefan Seyfried                     | "Please, just tell people
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices        |               to use KDE."
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg  |          -- Linus Torvalds

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel

Reply via email to