On Monday, 25 September 2006 08:57, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:30:49PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > i finally tested it and it seems to work.
> > >
> > > no, it didn't. But i fixed it. The placement of platform_finish() is
> > > non-intuitive :-)
> > >
> > > Also, moved to one ioctl with a parameter. If the style / ioctl design is
> > > ok, could we push this ASAP? It is pretty important to me to be able to
> > > test this further :-)
> > >
> > > I'll also clean up the userspace part (add a configuration variable so
> > > once
> > > can decide between "platform", "shutdown", maybe even "reboot", but that
> > > can
> > > still be done once the kernel part is pushed.
> > >
> > > This is for the kernel:
> > >
> > > Add an ioctl to user.c so that uswsusp can suspend correctly using the
> > > pm_ops methods.
> > >
> > > From: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Ack, can you push it to -mm?
>
> I'll do it. I did not get to writing the documentation, so let's hope Andrew
> will let this one still slip in without :-)
Andrew probably will, but some other people won't. :-) Anyway, we'll need to
update the documentation before it reaches the mainline.
Besides, I have a patch for swap file support in the works, so can we please
synchronize?
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
