Sorry - my fault. 
Tests run by Exxon showed that, compared to reference 
diesel fuel in  1993, a 20% blend of Biodiesel had 
significant, quantifiable  improvements in reducing wear 
(193 micron scar for B-20 vs. 492  micron scar for 
petrodiesel) and friction (0.13 micron scar for B-20 vs.  
0.24 micron for petrodiesel) while improving film coating 
ability of the  blend (93% film with the B-20 vs. 32% film 
with the petrodiesel). The  B-20 blend compared 
favorably for lubricity results against Exxonâs  own 
lubricity additive.
 

 The SWRI results for the BOCLE tests confirmed the 
earlier Exxon  study results. Low sulfur, low aromatic 
("CARB") diesel was compared  to various blends of 
Biodiesel (soy methyl esters). Data were presented  in 
values of grams of weight added to the apparatus before 
failure of  the fuel to adequately lubricate the metal. The 
higher the weight the  ball could support, the better the 
lubricity of the fuel. Neat petrodiesel  (low aromatic 
CARB) had a BOCLE result of 3,500 grams, whereas the  
neat Biodiesel had a BOCLE result almost twice as high 
at 6,100  grams. The B-20 blend had a BOCLE result of 
4,100 grams, close to  the value for pre-1993 (high 
sulfur, high aromatic) petrodiesel fuel. In  concentrations 
below 5%, the Biodiesel had no measurable effect on  
the lubricity of petrodiesel.
 
 Follow up BOCLE studies at SWRI in 1996 concluded 
that Biodiesel  methyl esters had even better lubricity 
properties than previously  reported. The Biodiesel 
(RME) had a BOCLE value of 7,000 grams vs.  4,250 for 
low sulfur diesel (not CARB diesel), and the B-20 blend 
had a  BOCLE value of 4,600 grams. Scar wear 
diameters were also  encouraging, with a 405 micron 
scar reported for petrodiesel vs. a 190  micron friction 
scar for the B-20 blend.
 
 Subsequent field studies on light duty truck engines 
(5.9L Cummins  diesel at the University of Idaho) have 
corroborated these results by  finding an "absence of 
wear" and friction scars on engines broken  down for 
inspection after a 100,000 mile road test running on 28%  
Biodiesel. In a University of Idaho durability test (1,000 
hour tests on  small diesel engines), it was found that 
methyl ester Biodiesel was  equivalent to no. 2 diesel on 
the basis of long term engine performance  and wear. 
The primary factors evaluated in that study were engine  
brake power and torque, injector tip coking (carbon 
deposition), and  engine component wear based on oil 
analysis.
 
 In house monitoring over the past 5 years of our "Biofuel 
Test  Vehicles" (a Mercedes Benz 300TD diesel station 
wagon and a 1985  BMW 524-Diesel) at CytoCulture has 
shown no evidence of unusual  wear or polymerization of 
engine crankcase oil (analysis performed by  Herguth 
Laboratories, Vallejo, CA) after more than 40,000 miles of  
operation on 30-100% blends with Biodiesel.
 
  


    This is quite interesting, unfortunately something happened to 
the latter part of the message, please do 
post the rest. 
    I might add that in looking over the specs for various veggie oils, 
I see little difference between 
cottonseed oil and rapeseed oil, perhaps someone could enlighten 
me on this? Is there a difference in 
lubricity? The iodine levels at least are pretty much the same.  


On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:54:08PM +0100, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> Here's something on lubrication from the Technical Handbook for  
> Marine Biodiesel in Recreational Boats  
> Lubricity Properties 
>  Biodiesel has been studied extensively in Europe and  
> the U.S. for its effect on long term engine wear,  
> particularly with respect to those components normally  
> lubricated by the fuel itself. Fuel pumps and injector  
> pumps depend on the operating fuel for lubrication of  
> moving parts and shaft bearings. Initial work on the  
> lubricity of Biodiesel, performed by Mark-IV Group and  
> the Southwest Research Institute in 1994, established a  
> clear advantage to blending Biodiesel with petrodiesel to  
> achieve superior lubrication.  
>  Lubricity properties are measured at the Southwest  
> Research Institute (SWRI) by a "Ball On Cylinder  
> Lubricity Evaluator" (BOCLE) machine to measure metal  
> to metal hydrodynamic wear simulating rotating shafts  
> and bearings. A static steel ball is loaded onto the edge  
> of a rotating disc and the diameter of the subsequent  
> scar on the ball is measured (similar reciprocating  
> machines exist in Europe to measure scar on a steel ball,  
> and newer versions have been developed in America to  
> improve lubricity measurements). The BOCLE test does  
> not measure adhesive friction wear. 
>  Tests run by Exxon showed that, compared to reference  
> diesel fuel in 1993, a  
> T 
>  
>  
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 

--  
Harmon Seaver    
CyberShamanix 
http://www.cybershamanix.com 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 
FREE COLLEGE MONEY 
CLICK HERE to search 
600,000 scholarships! 
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM 
---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html 
Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/  



------- End of forwarded message -------

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4.
No Minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to