Thanks, Bruce.  Was that single tank or two-tank?

Edward Beggs
http://www.biofuels.ca


On Wednesday, May 12, 2004, at 11:15 PM, Bruce Colley wrote:

>     Alexander Noack, senior engineer at Elsbett, recently told me that  
> they disassembled his Jetta TDI engine after 300,000 km (186,000 mi.)  
> with the following results:
>     -No detectible cylinder wear
>     -No injector coking
>     -Overall excellent condition
>         I think that this speaks to the validity of the Elsbett  
> system: Electric preheater, fuel-coolant heat exchanger, modification  
> of injectors, upgrading of glow plugs, and modification of engine  
> computer control settings.  If an engine/injector pump doesn't lend  
> itself to viable conversion, then they don't attempt to convert it.   
> If they do, then they engineer and test the system to verify proper  
> operation.  So far, I am impressed by my Elsbett Jetta TDI conversion,  
> but it is quite recent and I haven't gone through the winter yet.
>         Bruce Colley   Sustainable Energy Project                   
> www.sustainableenergyproject.org
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Neoteric Biofuels Inc
>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:25 AM
>   Subject: Re: [biofuel] 100,000 miles on SVO?
>
>
>   Tom:
>
>   First, I will say that we have always stated that WVO (Waste  
> Vegetable
>   Oil) or new plant oil conversion systems are to be considered
>   experimental and do not have millions of miles of testing that
>   biodiesel has had, at least not yet.
>
>     The interest and the funding shifted to biodiesel early on, it  
> seems,
>   after the tests in the early 80's, which went more or less along the
>   lines of:
>
>   1.Fill tank of then-current technology direct injection engine with
>   sunflower or soy oil (most often, it seems) and see what happens.
>
>   2. Wait for a high incidence of failures.
>
>   3. Write the report: "does not work very well or for very long".
>
>   I have no doubt that the researchers were sincere and reported
>   accurately, but at least in the studies from that era that I have  
> read
>   there were some common themes which are not reflective of the way
>   things are done now which are thought to improve the results.
>
>   Notably:
>
>   - there never seems to be mention of preheating the vegetable oil, to
>   reduce viscosity and thus make it easier on the lift pump, injection
>   pump, and also improve atomisaiton. That's the single biggest change,
>   which seems to improve results.
>
>   - the oils chosen were often less than ideal. According to the
>   information I have, oils such as Canola/rapeseed/mustard, coconut,  
> high
>   oleic sunflower (recent) might have yielded better results.
>
>   - the engines were often older type direct injection engines that did
>   not have the sort of (with variations, of course) two-stage (pilot
>   injection) high pressure, computer controlled systems we have today,
>   nor the sort of combustion chamber designs that exist today. They  
> were
>   of course also not indirect injection engines (which many say will  
> give
>   better results on plant oils than direct injection). There have been
>   quite successes in the use of indirect injection engines.
>
>   - there was no mention made of using two tanks, for easier starting,
>   operation of the engine on lighter fuel (diesel or biodiesel) until  
> it
>   was hot, and no purge cycle, again on the lighter and more  
> combustible
>   fuel, before shutdown.
>
>   - also there is no mention of use of techniques such as blends of  
> plant
>   oils with solvents and cosolvents, in combination with preheating, as
>   was done in some of the more recent, and very successful, trials of  
> the
>   ACREVO study, which is on our web site (blending 9% ethanol into
>   rapeseed oil, preheating to 80C, and use in a small displacement  
> direct
>   injection engine yielded very good results)
>
>   Regarding Shaine Tyson's comments, I am not sure how recent the study
>   is that is mentioned, but if recent,  then perhaps to put in proper
>   context, I'd ask this:
>
>   - were there a lot of premature failures documented, or is it just  
> that
>   these are mostly relatively recent conversions (most SVO conversions
>   and kits having been done only since 2000 or so) and so the miles  
> have
>   not been accumulated yet, and there is insufficient data to come to  
> any
>   conclusion about the effectiveness of the use of, in particular,
>   preheating and two-tank systems, for DI and IDI engines? If there  
> was a
>   high incidence of failures, were the causes examined? What were the
>   failures modes? What would they be attributed to? If examined, were
>   solutions sought?
>
>   RE: "my list" - I don't *have* a list - that's the point - we need  
> one
>   at this point in time. And, BTW, dozens of examples would be a decent
>   start, but not enough to really show anything. It'd be a start,  
> though,
>   if we did have a good list of at least that, a few dozen examples of
>   SVO high-milers. That's what I was looking for help in compiling.  
> It's
>   mentioned now and then, and we see a few attempts, but I have not yet
>   seen a serious effort at compiling a list of documented high-mileage
>   successes, in the way that positive results were compiled for
>   biodiesel, for example, while that was under development. It'd be  
> nice
>   to see it get a little more attention, especially in English, and
>   especially in North America, I think.
>
>   RE: "something funny" at 100,000-150,000 miles...well, no, I don't
>   think there is any magic number: we have all seen the reports and
>   horror stories about engines being ruined by use of plant oils in  
> short
>   order - so many hours, so many miles - again, mostly of the sort and
>   from the era and conditions mentioned above
>
>   ...but then we seem now to also be hearing more and more of better  
> long
>   term results than predicted - so far, too much anecdotally.
>
>     That needs to be examined in more detail. If there are getting to  
> be a
>   good number of  successes in teh longer term, how are they being
>   accomplished? What are the best practices? Of course, I have my own
>   ideas on that, as do many others, and some have been incorporated  
> into
>   kits, some would be related to engine type, conditions of use, type  
> of
>   fuel oil used, type of lubricating oil used, and so on.
>
>     Those need to be examined again - if something seems to be working
>   (i.e. there is progress being made), then find out what it is. If  
> there
>   are still, after doing those things, problem areas, identify them,  
> see
>   what can be done about them, or might be, or identify the knowledge
>   gaps.
>
>   You know, SVO has been written into the European Union rules as an
>   acceptable alternative fuel, alongside many others, including  
> biodiesel.
>
>   An original Elsbett engine in a Mercedes has recently, it is  
> reported,
>   gone over one million (!!) kilometers on vegetable oil. That's was a
>   direct injection engine, and it is also said that much of the
>   technology used in that engine's injector and combustion chamber  
> design
>   found its way into the TDI many years later!
>
>   RE: the rumours of "horrors of  TDI" conversion....I am not sure what
>   you refer to here, I have not heard much of this. I do know that the
>   TDI runs cool, does not generate a lot of waste heat, and so if run
>   under light loads on poorly heated oil, that could be a problem. I  
> have
>   been told they have a tendency to "coke up", even on diesel fuel - at
>   least that's what my VW-dealer-mechanic friend told me, and I suspect
>   that would be worse if they are run under light loads or in the city  
> a
>   lot. So, the preheating, electric preheating, and two tank (on diesel
>   or biodiesel until the engine gets hotter), would help in that, I  
> would
>   think.
>
>   Regards,
>
>   Edward Beggs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   On Tuesday, May 11, 2004, at 04:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ed-
>>
>> I think I should step gingerly here, I know you promote WVO conversion
>> systems. However, I refer to Shaine Tyson, late of the National
>> Renewable Energy
>> Laboratory who gave a talk in Connecticut last year, stating that in
>> all of the
>> national research, only one truck was found that had lasted 150,000
>> miles on
>> SVO. How does this square with your list? Are you starting out with
>> dozens of
>> examples, or is it a short list? Something funny happen over 100,000
>> and under
>> 150,000, or is this technology particularly hard on direct injection
>> engines?
>> We want to know the real value of this technology. Are the rumors
>> about the
>> horrors of TDI conversions true? Why, what goes wrong?
>>
>> Tom Leue
>>
>> In a message dated 5/11/04 2:10:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I often get asked how many engines, specifically modern direct
>>> injection engines, I know of, that have gone more than the magic
>>> number
>>> (for some reason) of 100,000 miles (yes, miles, not kilometers,
>>> please...so, let's say over 160,000 km)
>>>
>>> I know I could spend hours scouring the databases, such as they  
>>> exist,
>>> translating from German sites, etc. etc...but if anyone needs a good
>>> research project for academic work, this is one!!
>>>
>>> Or, if you just want to send me notice of examples of such that you
>>> are
>>> aware of, please do!
>>>
>>> Please exclude old Mercedes.....I know there are lots of those that
>>> have gone that far...I am looking for TDI's, modern trucks,  
>>> equivalent
>>> hours on gensets or tractors (let's see...1600 hours at 100
>>> km/h....ok,
>>> let's say over 1600 hours),  etc.
>>>
>>> I'll compile these as they come in, unless someone out there can set
>>> up
>>> a self-admin database for us, which would be a heck of a lot easier,
>>> and more accessible for all....
>>>
>>> The SVO 100,000 Mile Club Database.....anyone up for doing that?
>>>
>>> We can host it on our server space if need be, I think.
>>>
>>> Spread the word? Help get it going?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Edward Beggs
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------
>> Homestead Inc.
>> www.yellowbiodiesel.com
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>> ---------------------~-->
>> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
>> http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ~->
>>
>> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>>
>> Biofuels list archives:
>> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
>>
>> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>   Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>   http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
>   Biofuels list archives:
>   http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
>
>   Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
>   To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> -------
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
>
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of  
> Service.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
> ---------------------~-->
> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
> Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ~->
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
>
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to