Real Men Reduce Oil Demand

New York Times Editorial Board

May 19, 2004

By focusing on the supply-side role of OPEC, the candidates are 
confusing the issue about oil and gas prices. The answer lies in 
transforming our economy to be more energy efficient and, ultimately, 
powered by renewables. The NYT Editorial Board feels similarly. It's 
a start.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/19/opinion/19WED1.html
The New York Times > Opinion > Gasoline Hysteria

Gasoline Hysteria

Published: May 19, 2004

With the election season moving into full swing as Americans start 
thinking about their summer travel plans, it's sadly predictable that 
politicians will try to curry favor with voters by playing silly 
blame games and proposing simplistic quick fixes for rising gasoline 
prices, which are averaging more than $2 a gallon. A case in point is 
the demand made yesterday by 20 Senate Democrats that the government 
release as much as 60 million barrels of oil from the Strategic 
Petroleum Reserve over the next two months.

President Bush is rightly resisting the call. Since 9/11, the 
administration has been adding to the reserve in a disciplined 
manner, and it is closing in on its goal of filling up the reserve's 
capacity, 700 million barrels. Tapping the reserve to assuage 
motorists at a time of increasing security threats to already tight 
fuel supplies would be foolish.

As the energy secretary, Spencer Abraham, correctly noted yesterday, 
"The reserve is not there to simply try to change prices." In fact, 
the law calls for it to be tapped only in the event of supply 
disruptions. And even if Washington wanted to alleviate rising fuel 
costs, the reserve is not a very effective instrument for doing so, 
as President Bill Clinton learned in the fall of 2000. Experts 
estimate that at most, turning on the spigot now would knock only a 
few cents off a gallon.

Senator John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, 
knows this, of course, and he demeans the seriousness of his own 
candidacy when he suggests that President Bush could single-handedly 
bring down fuel costs. Senator Kerry has urged the administration to 
stop buying oil for the reserve, as if that would make a difference. 
Fortunately, some residue of shame has kept him from joining the 
other Democrats calling for the reserve to be raided. The 
government's oil purchases have taken place at a time of higher 
prices, but they are not a major cause of the increase.

The real culprit behind rising energy costs is the roaring demand 
from growing economies, especially China's and the United States', 
though the volatile situation in the Middle East does seem to add a 
risk premium. Most of China's energy demand is for industrialization, 
which, in turn, contributes to the global economic recovery. In 
contrast, roughly half of the United States' petroleum demand is for 
personal consumption, primarily for cars, trucks and S.U.V.'s, a 
situation that, in turn, makes the nation ever more dependent on an 
increasingly endangered supply of foreign oil.

If $2-per-gallon sticker shock slowed sales of Hummers - which get 
about 11 miles per gallon - that would hardly qualify as a national 
tragedy.

Still, even Americans who don't drive gas-guzzling S.U.V.'s are 
feeling pain at the pump, and responsible political leaders have to 
prepare the public for this new reality. No comprehensive energy 
policy should overlook long-term means of encouraging conservation 
and minimizing our dependence on oil from the Persian Gulf region. 
Rather than pretending that there are facile switch-flipping fixes, 
Senator Kerry should be talking about bolstering conservation efforts 
and fuel economy standards, and encouraging new investment in 
refining capacity.

In the meantime, we all need to keep the shrill hyperbole about 
"record high" oil prices in perspective. A barrel of oil now costs 
more than $40, but when adjusted for inflation, that price is less 
alarming. During past spikes, oil has cost well over twice that 
amount in today's dollars. Yes, high fuel costs could ultimately 
endanger the economic recovery, but there is no reason to believe 
that they will do so at this level.



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to