Tundra test stuns scientists
 Carbon dioxide could be dumped into atmosphere
 Raises spectre of accelerated global warming
 PETER CALAMAI  SCIENCE REPORTER 
 Sep. 23, 2004 
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1095891011063

 OTTAWA÷Dramatic results made public today from a unique 20-year
 American experiment are raising the spectre of runaway warming
 above the Arctic tundra that would accelerate global climate change.

 The findings, if confirmed with additional studies, could also doom
 Canada's Kyoto plan targets for reducing emissions of carbon dioxide,
 the leading greenhouse gas.

 This double whammy arises because U.S. researchers discovered climate
 warming might trigger conditions where tundra decomposition will dump
 carbon dioxide into the atmosphere faster than it's soaked up by
 accelerated plant growth.

 This extra carbon dioxide could trigger a "positive feedback,"
 speeding up the rate of global warming even more, warns a study
 published today in Nature, the influential British research journal.

 The results also add extra urgency to a planned November meeting of
 ministers from Canada and seven other circumpolar countries, called to
 approve a program to tackle the impact of climate change in the Arctic.
 More than 40 per cent of the world's Arctic vegetation region lies in Canada.

 Until now, most studies projected that the tundra would be a
 carbon dioxide "sink" rather than a source under climate change.
 Meeting Canada's Kyoto targets depends on getting credit for
 net reduction of carbon dioxide in the tundra. 

 But if all the carbon currently stored as peat, moss and other
 ancient vegetation in the top metre of tundra decomposed, that
 would boost global atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide by
 roughly 25 per cent, says Paul Grogan, a Queen's University
 expert in northern ecosystems.

 "This study raises some big questions," said Grogan, holder of
 a Canada Research Chair who co-authored a commentary about the
 findings in Nature.

 Grogan and the study's lead author, Michelle Mack, both emphasized
 that the experiments carried out at a long-term ecological research
 site in Alaska looked at just one key aspect ÷ the impact of more
 nutrients in the soil ÷ in the complex cycling of carbon between
 the atmosphere and the earth.

 The findings might not hold true in different northern regions,
 like the immense boreal bogs or the so-called polar desert.

 And other environmental influences need to be included in
 any calculation, such as permafrost thawing and warmer soil,
 the researchers say.

 "There is a lot of diversity in tundra," cautioned Mack, a
 professor in the University of Florida's botany department
 who carried out the field work as a researcher at the
 University of Alaska in Fairbanks.

 Despite such cautions, the experimental findings are so dramatic
 and unexpected that the study has already aroused great interest
 among Arctic ecologists and climate-change scientists.

 "These results challenge some of our assumptions that
 more vegetation and trees mean that you're
 automatically storing net carbon, even if only temporarily,"
 says Tim Moore, a McGill University geography professor
 investigating the carbon cycle in a bog near Ottawa.

 Mack found that the artificially fertilized tundra plots near
 Toolik Lake in Alaska suffered a net loss of two kilograms of
 carbon per square metre in the 20 years between 2000 and 1981,
 when the experiment began. Most of the loss took place in
 layers deeper than five centimetres, and had been missed
 previously because measurements went no deeper than the root level.

 "This was probably the most surprising thing that I and
 my colleagues had seen for a long time," Mack recalled.

 The addition of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer mimicked
 nutrient conditions expected under the pronounced warming
 projected in the Arctic by climate-change models.
 Microbes become more active as soil warms and digest organic matter,
 transforming carbon to carbon dioxide and freeing up nutrients like
 nitrogen and phosphorous that spur plant growth.

 The U.S. experiments found that plant growth doubled atop the tundra,
 with a knee-high species of woody shrub replacing low sedges. But
 the extra carbon locked up in this new vegetation was outweighed by
 carbon released through accelerated decomposition and leaching in
 the tundra.

 "These are the first people to look at what happens by
 digging deeper in the soil," said Grogan.

 The Queen's professor has just launched a similar research project at
 Daring Lake, some 480 kilometres north of Yellowknife in the
 Northwest Territories. Unlike the U.S. experiment, the Canadians are
 varying the concentrations of fertilizer applied, and using greenhouses
 to raise temperatures and snow fences to manipulate the snow cover.

 Grogan estimated it would take at least five years
 to produce the first results.

 Canada lags far behind the U.S. and other circumpolar countries in
 almost every area of Arctic science because low federal funding
 over the last two decades has stymied older northern researchers and
 discouraged new scientists from entering the field.
 <><><><><><> 


 RESEARCHERS FIND FROZEN NORTH MAY ACCELERATE CLIMATE CHANGE
 October 07, 2004 - (date of web publication) 
 http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2004/0929frozenclimate.html 

 NASA-funded researchers have found that despite their sub-zero
 temperatures, a warming north may add more carbon to the atmosphere
 from soil, accelerating climate warming further.  [more]
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Reply via email to