>Because Hardee's makes no pretensions that the Hardee's thickburger >is good for you. > >And they are reveling in the publicity from Jacobson's group, Leno >and Letterman. > >Jacobson says that if Hardee's persists in marketing this junk, it >should at least list calories right up on the menu board.
I stand by what I said. There are far worse than Hardies. There comes a point when the line must be drawn. How long until there are disclaimers on everything? No, while the others are putting salads out that claim to be healthy (when in fact they can be just as unhealthy), and subway comes shy of calling their food diet cuisene at least Hardies has the guts to admit that their burger is big and bad. We have to take some of the blame some time. The masses can't sit back and blame everyone else for their problems. FDA approved drugs (meaning, someone said they are OK) that are harmfull is quite different than someone "choosing" to go into a hardies, "choosing" the burger and then actually eating it. What's next, blaming mother nature for polluting the environment with poision ivy? I didn't read 2003's list but if the Catholic Church wasn't in that list then it has my vote leaps and bounds above Hardies (And by the church I mean the organizational structure, not each and every member). _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
