Fritz,

I do not understand this dialogue, when you have a whole nation who 
on average use 1/3 of energy compared to US and 1/4 compared to 
Canada, based on equivalent to R-2000 from 1978 and R-1000 from 1958. 
I like log homes and your sales pitch have some values for home 
buyers, but it is not a nation wide recipe for conserving energy. I 
really hope that you sell more log homes, but doubt that they alone 
will have any major impact on the energy use.

A country renew their building stock with between 1 to 2% a year and 
any serious conservation effort must therefore include much more than 
new constructions. Methods that can be implemented in refurbishing of 
buildings are therefore much more important. I doubt that log homes 
will fit very well in this picture.

Hakan

At 20:10 05/06/2006, you wrote:
>Hi Joe,
>you are rigth on with your comment!
>Those"Airtigth" Homes need to be serviced by mechanical 
>Aircontrol,wich create again a energieconsumption by 
>itself.Considerin lots of fixt Windows and the great ability of 
>american Windowmakers to trow away all phisical Laws,you end up with 
>Windows of sometimes very big dimention and ridicule small openings 
>for Ventilation at the Bottom of the Windows,so the warm,humid air 
>stays trappet in the upper part of the room or house.It is common 
>knowledge, it takes more energie to keep humid air warm than to 
>reheat cold air!Drywallconstructin is creating also a unhaelty 
>klimat,so you need a humidifier and so on.
>Double Loghomes (machined dry Lumber T+G) can be built to Standards 
>of Low-energie Homes with K-Value of 0,19W/m2k now i havnt been able 
>to convert this into our R-Value but i am certain,it beats R 2000 by far.
>Combined a good craftet double Loghome with my 68mm Windows,you have 
>there a  Energie efficien home.
>Fore the Larchwood is to say,Larch is probably the best wood in the 
>northern Hemisphere but have never beeing commercially used because 
>it was in the old times to havy to float and it is so darn hard,that 
>carpenters could not nail it.
>But with good machines its a peace of cake!There is an other apect 
>talking for Larchwood: one dont need to treat the wood chemically 
>for protection,the most you need to du is applying a coat of 
>Linseedoil (for esthetics only)
>Windows and Doors from Larch are very durable to.
>If you consider the Whole Picture: Larch built homes are higly 
>energyefficient,
>made from a readyly availible lowcost Source and for people with 
>allergies the ideal Home.Combine this with excellent workmanship and 
>you get a result that stand up for centurys (I know Larchbuilt homes 
>with up to 800 years of age)
>
>I have no experiance in rammed eart construction,but would raise 
>some doubts about such a technique for canadian climate
>
>Fritz
>_______________________________________________
>Biofuel mailing list
>Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>
>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
>Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to