I'm getting the idea that I wouldn't want many of the people here on this online comunity anywhere near me when sh*t happens.
It is my outlook that everybody has something to offer in a true survival situation.

John

Keith Addison wrote:
I would think this is the ideal forum for discussing any aspects and options
for reducing our dependence on fossil fuels, particularly in terms of
sustainability.
    

Indeed it is, as a great deal of previous discussion residing in the 
list archives will attest, covering, I'm sure, all aspects of the 
issue.

  
What is truly sad is closed mindedness.
    

Wouldn't you think, David, that's it's perhaps a little closed-minded 
to arrive at a mature forum such as this and just naturally assume 
such an obvious subject hasn't been dealt with here before in the 
last six years? I think the reason Robert would be laughing if only 
it wasn't so sad is that your argument has had all the substance shot 
right out of it long ago.

It's also a little closed-minded to to assume that it's Robert who's 
being closed-minded, apparently without checking first to see what he 
might have posted on the subject before, or even checking his 
website, though he provides the url. This, eg:
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/p5.htm
Ranger Supercharger Project

Maybe you owe him an apology.

I have to say the same for your views on nuclear power:

>From an objective
  
scientific and engineering, as opposed to the politically correct view, the
use of nuclear energy is the solution. ( Please don't scream Three Mile
Island and Chernobyl) Fission reactors will have to do until we develop a
functional fusion reactor which is by its physics inherently safe.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    

That argument has also been shot down thoroughly and many times.

I find it a little sad the way you ascribe objections to nuclear 
power to mere politically correctness. Not objective, eh, no facts?

I suggest you go and do some reading, offlist, at the address listed 
at the end of every message you receive from the list:

  
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
    

When you've done that (make sure you do a thorough job), please come 
back and offer some support for your view that objections to nuclear 
power have only political correctness to support them.

Thankyou.
 
Best wishes

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
KYOTO Pref., Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/
Biofuel list owner


  
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "robert and benita rabello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <biofuel@sustainablelists.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Worldwide oil consumption seen soaring


    
chem.dd wrote:

      
The bottom line is that the world has to go Hydrogen.

        
    Are you SURE you want to go there in this forum?  I'd be laughing if
your proposition wasn't so sad.

robert luis rabello
"The Edge of Justice"
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/
      


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  

_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to