>Kirk do you have a reference?  What Swiss Study?

Hans Hertel's study, the one referred to in the original post:
http://snipurl.com/16d3w
[Biofuel] Radiation Ovens, the Proven Dangers of Microwaves

And in my reply to Robert, below:

>>>Some further bracingly cheerful news for you, from Acres USA: 
>>>http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/microwave.html
>>>The Hidden Hazards of Microwave Cooking

Best

Keith


>Joe
>
>Kirk McLoren wrote:
>
>>you can only do the best you can.
>>Some things may not be clear.
>>The microwave evidence is clear.
>>We ceased microwaving after the Swiss study.
>>I hope you do the same.
>>
>>Kirk
>>
>>robert and benita rabello <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Keith Addison wrote:
>>
>>>Sympathies Robert (though we're all in the same lifeboat), but are 
>>>you sure you're figuring it right? Maybe the next sentence would 
>>>be   "but I didn't die long go so it must all be nonsense".
>>>
>>
>>    No, that's not what I was thinking.  The sheer volume of 
>>environmental insult we're subjected to seems overwhelming, and 
>>depressing.  Someone posted an article here about water 
>>contamination in the "pristine" lakes of various BC mountain 
>>ranges, due to airborne pollutants.  We simply can't get away from 
>>the problem anymore.  The air quality in Vancouver (right on the 
>>beach) is often marginal because of smog blowing in from Asia.
>>
>>    Sigh . . .
>>
>>    But the fact that I HAVEN'T keeled over yet is a tribute to the 
>>robust nature of the human body.
>>
>>> But are you   going to live as long and as healthily as your 
>>>grandparents did, say?
>>>
>>
>>    Likely more.  I've already outlived my father, and I've only a 
>>few years remaining before I outlive my paternal grandmother. 
>>Recall, however, that my family is from Brasil, and that life 
>>expectancy among my grandparent's generation wasn't great . . .  If 
>>I outlive my in-laws, I'll be doing well!
>>
>>>How about your children?
>>>
>>
>>    That concerns me!
>>
>>> You still have some difficulty grasping the   Precautionary 
>>>Principle eh? More than enough reason for at least   precaution in 
>>>all thoise issues you mention. You'd rather have proof   beyond 
>>>all possibility of denial while various corporate bottom-lines 
>>>get optimised even better and even more crap gets externalised 
>>>your   way? Powerful stuff denial, especially considering the 
>>>gigabuck   resources of the deniers. Downright pity about all the 
>>>collateral in   the meantime though.
>>>
>>
>>    Indeed!  But my take on this is a little bit more complicated 
>>than you seem to grasp.  I grew up in a subculture where taboos on 
>>food were related to a person's spiritual condition and had to be 
>>accepted without criticism.  Cheese, for instance, was considered 
>>unfit for human consumption.  (I'm NOT kidding!)  The consumption 
>>of meat was frowned upon, and NOBODY ate pork or shellfish.  We 
>>didn't drink alcohol,  or take drugs (unless prescribed by a 
>>physician, and then, only with great reluctance).  We didn't smoke 
>>cigarettes, or chew tobacco either.  Some of these things are 
>>clearly unhealthy, while the impact on health of the prohibited 
>>foods is either scientifically unsupported or downright silly.
>>
>>    But I wouldn't have come to that conclusion had I not begun 
>>questioning what had been presented to me as fact.  As far as the 
>>Precautionary Principle is concerned, you're right to point out 
>>that I'm having trouble embracing it, but please bear in mind that 
>>it's a very different way of thinking, and it takes time to 
>>assimilate what I learn here.  (I've already abandoned 
>>vegetarianism, and that was REALLY tough!)  It gets to the point 
>>where it seems EVERYTHING is bad for human health, the sky is 
>>falling and we're all going to die horribly . . .
>>
>>    Now, as far as microwave ovens are concerned, my sweetheart 
>>uses ours for reheating food and I use it when warming water for 
>>tea.  If we applied the Precautionary Principle to our society as a 
>>whole, we'd have to get rid of electricity because of EMF concerns, 
>>fossil hydrocarbon fuels because of cancer and global warming 
>>worries, mineral extraction because of heavy metals leaching into 
>>groundwater, and on and on and on . . .
>>
>>    Perhaps I'm overstating the case, and maybe this stems from the 
>>fact that I really haven't wrapped my mind around the Precautionary 
>>Principle yet.  But where DOES it stop, Keith?  (Air and water 
>>pollution are pretty obvious candidates for broad based application 
>>of the Precautionary Principle, but what about mineral extraction, 
>>or forestry?  Can we survive as a society without mining some of 
>>the earth's dowry?)  I can hear the extremists from my past 
>>screaming that milk "is designed to grow a calf into a cow for a 
>>year," and that we should never consume milk or milk products 
>>because of potential deleterious impacts on human health.  They 
>>too, cite studies to prove their point and tell me that the 
>>arthritis in my joints stems from drinking milk over such a long 
>>period of time.
>>
>>    Please forgive me for ranting about this.  I'm TRYING to 
>>understand, but I'm frustrated, too!
>>
>>>Some further bracingly cheerful news for you, from Acres USA: 
>>><http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/microwave.html>http://www.nexus 
>>>magazine.com/articles/microwave.html  The Hidden Hazards of 
>>>Microwave Cooking
>>>
>>
>>    Lovely!
>>
>>    I reheat most of my food in the toaster oven, and I've been 
>>trying to get my longsuffering wife to do the same.  I'm printing 
>>this article for her to read.
>>
>>(growing things again)
>>
>>>  We're under snow right now but there's plenty still growing 
>>>here,   different kinds of greens that can take the cold, Chinese 
>>>cabbages,   ta sai, kometsuma, Swiss chard and so on, and turnips 
>>>and stuff.   We're still digging new potatoes! We planted them 
>>>much too late, I   didn't think we'd get anything, but there's 
>>>quite a lot, nice! We'll   be harvesting winter-hardy onions soon, 
>>>planted in September (or was   it October). We should be able to 
>>>get us and the poultry through to   the spring on fresh food.
>>>
>>
>>    You're a model of self-sufficiency, Keith!  Our ground is rock 
>>hard right now.
>>
>>>Anyway, what makes you so sure there'll be a spring? :-)
>>>
>>
>>    I read a book by Michael Drosnin concerning equidistant letter 
>>sequences in the Old Testament.  (It's his second one on the 
>>subject, and has to rank among the most rambling and ill-written 
>>things I've read in a long time!)  He advocates using this 
>>technique as a kind of palantir to determine the future, and warned 
>>that we'd suffer a nuclear holocaust in 2006, because the words 
>>"nuclear", "holocaust" and the equivalent year of "2006" in the 
>>Hebrew calendar all cross one another.  Given that today is the 
>>last day of the year, if he's right, tomorrow is going to be very 
>>different!
>>
>>    I'm either skeptical, or I've got my head in the sand.  I want 
>>spring to come.  It'll be good to get out in the garden again.
>>
>>    Now, if I can just get that pesky truck of mine running . . .
>>
>>robert luis rabello  "The Edge of Justice"  "The Long Journey"  New 
>>Adventure for Your Mind 
>><http://www.newadventure.ca/>http://www.newadventure.ca    Ranger 
>>Supercharger Project Page 
>><http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/>http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabell 
>>o/


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to