Oil sands hit major 'hurdle' in California Alberta's energy resources at
disadvantage under state rule limiting greenhouse gases

Byline: Martin Mittelstaedt

The tar sands are one of the most
prolific sources of energy in North America, but the
fabled petroleum resource may have trouble finding a
market in California under a new state policy
requiring all vehicle fuels sold there to produce lower
emissions of greenhouse gases.
While most new laws on cleaner-burning fuel look
only at tailpipe emissions, the new California policy,
announced this week by Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger, has an unusual twist.
It will count gases discharged during the full life
cycle of the petroleum, a move that puts Alberta's oil
sands at a disadvantage because gasoline derived
from this source requires huge quantities of energy to
extract and mine the sticky bitumen.
The oil sands have long been controversial in Canada
because of their large greenhouse-gas emissions, but
the action in California is the first sign that crude
from this source might not find a welcome market in
the United States on environmental grounds.
"This is such a groundbreaking plan," said Hal
Harvey, environment program director for the
California-based Hewlett Foundation, which helped
pay for the research that led to the new directive.
Under the state's so-called low-carbon fuel standard,
all transportation fuel sold will have to reduce the
amount of greenhouse gases emitted during its
production and final use by at least 10 per cent by
2020.
Mr. Harvey says Alberta's oil sands are such a
relatively high- emission source of energy -- he puts
it at about 20-per-cent higher than gasoline from
conventional crude -- that he believes refiners will be
reluctant to buy the product when the new policy, to
be issued as a directive by Mr. Schwarzenegger, goes
into effect.
"I don't think it would be purchased," Mr. Harvey
said. "It creates a very large hurdle."
He said Canadian tar sands producers will have to
develop ways of substantially lowering
greenhouse-gas emissions or risk being shut out of
the California market.
"What it really suggests is that it will behoove the
Canadian oil industry to think about a carbon
mitigation strategy," Mr. Harvey said.
Very little synthetic crude from Alberta is currently
sold in California, the largest U.S. fuel market. The
bulk of U.S. exports go to the Rocky Mountain and
Midwest regions, according to officials with Suncor
Energy Inc. and Syncrude Canada Ltd., the two big
producers in the Alberta oil sands.
Syncrude spokesman Alain Moore declined to
comment on the impact the directive will have on the
company, but said it has been able to reduce its
greenhouse-gas emissions by about 1.7 per cent a
year for each barrel of oil produced through
efficiency measures.
Brad Bellows, a spokesman for Suncor, said the
Canadian industry estimates the amount of extra
greenhouse-gas production from synthetic oil may be
as little as 7.6 per cent, compared with conventional
crude, far lower than Mr. Harvey's estimate. Mr.
Bellows said the company will be able to cope with
the new regulation if the lower Canadian figure is
accepted.
"I don't think that we're actually at any serious
disadvantage with synthetic crude," he said.
Mr. Bellows said that because of the paucity of U.S.
pipeline connections, the quantity of oil from the tar
sands that enters California is limited.
But Mr. Harvey predicted that the California measure
will spread to the U.S. markets that are more
important for Alberta's oil sands. California has
generally led U.S. states in the field of air-pollution
initiatives, and he expects the idea of regulating the
full life cycle emissions from gasoline and diesel fuel
to be adopted by other U.S. jurisdictions.
"I think it will [spread]. It's a very appealing
measure," he said.
The California standard is expected to be in place
formally by late 2008, according to state timelines.
According to the state, refiners will be able to meet
the new directive through measures such as blending
low-carbon ethanol into their fuel, or purchasing
credits to offset emissions from other companies that
have reduced their discharges.
Late last year, the Pembina Institute, a Canadian
environmental think tank, estimated that the oil sands
will contribute nearly half of the country's growth of
greenhouse-gas emissions between 2003 and 2010
unless the industry adopts measures to offset
discharges.
(c) 2007 CTVglobemedia Publishing Inc. All Rights
Reserved.



-- 
Darryl McMahon
It's your planet.  If you won't look after it, who will?

The Emperor's New Hydrogen Economy (now in print and eBook)
http://www.econogics.com/TENHE/

_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to