Solar <http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Solar> 

 Cheap solar power poised to undercut oil and gas by half
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/02/19/ccvie\
w19.xml> - Within five years, solar power will be cheap enough to
compete with carbon-generated electricity, even in Britain, Scandinavia
or upper Siberia. In a decade, the cost may have fallen so dramatically
that solar cells could undercut oil, gas, coal and nuclear power by up
to half. (Telegraph; UK; Feb. 18) 
(Thanks Fred Burks <http://www.wanttoknow.info/aboutus#burks> ) 
  Monday view: Cheap solar power poised to undercut oil and gas by half
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
  Last Updated: 11:31pm GMT 18/02/2007
  

  
  
  Within five years, solar power will be cheap enough to compete with 
carbon-generated electricity, even in Britain, Scandinavia or upper Siberia. In 
a decade, the cost may have fallen so dramatically that solar cells could 
undercut oil, gas, coal and nuclear power by up to half. Technology is leaping 
ahead of a stale political debate about fossil fuels.
  Anil Sethi, the chief executive of the Swiss start-up company Flisom, says he 
looks forward to the day - not so far off - when entire cities in America and 
Europe generate their heating, lighting and air-conditioning needs from solar 
films on buildings with enough left over to feed a surplus back into the grid.
  The secret? Mr Sethi lovingly cradles a piece of dark polymer foil, as thin a 
sheet of paper. It is 200 times lighter than the normal glass-based solar 
materials, which require expensive substrates and roof support. Indeed, it is 
so light it can be stuck to the sides of buildings.
    advertisement
                      
























      



























  Rather than being manufactured laboriously piece by piece, it can be 
mass-produced in cheap rolls like packaging - in any colour.
  The "tipping point" will arrive when the capital cost of solar power falls 
below $1 (51p) per watt, roughly the cost of carbon power. We are not there 
yet. The best options today vary from $3 to $4 per watt - down from $100 in the 
late 1970s.
  Mr Sethi believes his product will cut the cost to 80 cents per watt within 
five years, and 50 cents in a decade.
  It is based on a CIGS (CuInGaSe2) semiconductor compound that absorbs light 
by freeing electrons. This is then embedded on the polymer base. It will be 
ready commercially in late 2009.
  "It'll even work on a cold, grey, cloudy day in England, which still produces 
25pc to 30pc of the optimal light level. That is enough, if you cover half the 
roof," he said.
  "We don't need subsidies, we just need governments to get out of the way and 
do no harm. They've spent $170bn subsidising nuclear power over the last thirty 
years," he said.
  His ultra-light technology, based on a copper indium compound, can power 
mobile phones and laptop computers with a sliver of foil.
  "You won't have to get down on your knees ever again to hunt for plug 
socket," he said
  Michael Rogol, a solar expert at Credit Lyonnais, expects the solar industry 
to grow from $7bn in 2004 to nearer $40bn by 2010, with operating earnings of 
$3bn.
  The sector is poised to outstrip wind power. It is a remarkable boom for a 
technology long dismissed by experts as hopelessly unviable.
  Mr Rogol said he was struck by the way solar use had increased dramatically 
in Japan and above all Germany, where Berlin's green energy law passed in 2004 
forces the grid to buy surplus electricity from households at a fat premium. 
(In Britain, utilities may refuse to buy the surplus. They typically pay half 
the customer price of electricity.)
  The change in Germany's law catapulted the share price of the German flagship 
company SolarWorld from €1.38 (67p) in February 2004 to over €60 by early 2006.
  The tipping point in Germany and Japan came once households twigged that they 
could undercut their unloved utilities. Credit Lyonnais believes the rest of 
the world will soon join the stampede.
  Mike Splinter, chief executive of the US semiconductor group Applied 
Materials, told me his company is two years away from a solar product that 
reaches the magic level of $1 a watt.
  Cell conversion efficiency and economies of scale are galloping ahead so fast 
that the cost will be down to 70 US cents by 2010, with a target of 30 or 40 
cents in a decade.
  "We think solar power can provide 20pc of all the incremental energy needed 
worldwide by 2040," he said.
  "This is a very powerful technology and we're seeing dramatic improvements 
all the time. It can be used across the entire range from small houses to big 
buildings and power plants," he said.
  "The beauty of this is that you can use it in rural areas of India without 
having to lay down power lines or truck in fuel."
  Villages across Asia and Africa that have never seen electricity may soon 
leapfrog directly into the solar age, replicating the jump to mobile phones 
seen in countries that never had a network of fixed lines. As a by-product, 
India's rural poor will stop blanketing the subcontinent with soot from tens of 
millions of open stoves.
  Applied Materials is betting on both of the two rival solar technologies: 
thin film panels best used where there is plenty of room and the traditional 
crystalline (c-Si) wafer-based cells, which are not as cheap but produce a 
higher yield - better for tight spaces.
  Needless to say, electricity utilities are watching the solar revolution with 
horror. Companies in Japan and Germany have already seen an erosion of profits 
because of an effect known "peak shaving". In essence, the peak wattage of 
solar cells overlaps with hours of peak demand and peak prices for electricity 
in the middle of the day, crunching margins.
  As for the oil companies, they are still treating solar power as a fringe 
curiosity. "There is no silver bullet," said Jeroen Van der Veer, Shell's chief 
executive.
  "We have invested a bit in all forms of renewable energy ourselves and maybe 
we'll find a winner one day. But the reality is that in twenty years time we'll 
still be using more oil than now," he said.
  Might he be wrong?

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20071102/b2f9bf18/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to