http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/10/09-0
Published on Wednesday, October 9, 2013 by Common Dreams
Are Utility Companies Out to Destroy Solar's 'Rooftop Revolution'?
In California, customers who install solar systems and battery arrays
are finding themselves cut off from grid
- Jon Queally, staff writer
In the nation's largest state, California, the major utility
companies are trying to limit growth.
Of rooftop solar panels, that is.
According to reporting by Bloomberg, the state's three largest
utilities-Edison International, PG&E Corp. and Sempra Energy-are
"putting up hurdles" to homeowners who have installed sun-powered
energy systems, especially those with "battery backups wired to solar
panels," in order to slow the spread of what has become a threat to
their dominant business model.
"The utilities clearly see rooftop solar as the next threat," Ben
Peters, a government affairs analyst at solar company Mainstream
Energy Corp., told Bloomberg. "They're trying to limit the growth."
According to Peters, as the business news outlet reports, the dispute
between those with solar arrays and the utility giants "threatens the
state's $2 billion rooftop solar industry and indicates the depth of
utilities' concerns about consumers producing their own power.
People with rooftop panels are already buying less electricity, and
adding batteries takes them closer to the day they won't need to buy
from the local grid at all."
Citing but one example, Bloomberg reports:
Matthew Sperling, a Santa Barbara, California, resident, installed
eight panels and eight batteries at his home in April.
"We wanted to have an alternative in case of a blackout to keep the
refrigerator running," he said in an interview. Southern California
Edison rejected his application to link the system to the grid even
though city inspectors said "it was one of the nicest they'd ever
seen," he said.
"We've installed a $30,000 system and we can't use it," Sperling said.
The utilities argue that customers with solar energy-storing
batteries might be rigging the system by fraudulently storing
conventional energy sent in from the utility grid, storing it in the
batteries, and then sending it back to the grid for credit. The solar
companies say there is no proof that this is happening.
What environmentalists and solar energy advocates see is the utility
companies putting barriers up to a decentralized system they will not
no longer be able to control or profit from.
As Danny Kennedy, author of the book "Rooftop Revolution" and
co-founder of solar company Sungevity in California, said in an
interview with Alternet earlier this year:
Solar power represents a change in electricity that has a
potentially disruptive impact on power in both the literal sense
(meaning how we get electricity) and in the figurative sense of how
we distribute wealth and power in our society. Fossil fuels have led
to the concentration of power whereas solar's potential is really to
give power over to the hands of people. This shift has huge
community benefits while releasing our dependency on the
centralized, monopolized capital of the fossil fuel industry. So
it's revolutionary in the technological and political sense.
As this Sierra Club video shows, the idea of a 'rooftop revolution'
is fundamental to what many see as the most promising development in
terms of undermining the dominance of the fossil fuel paradigm in the
U.S.:
The tensions between decentralized forms of energy like rootop solar
or small-scale wind and traditional large-scale utilities is nothing
new, but as the crisis of climate change has spurred a global
grassroots movement push for a complete withdrawal from the fossil
fuel and nuclear paradigm that forms the basis of the current
electricity grid, these tensions are growing.
As this segment from a PBS profile of the work of Lester Brown shows,
a future of a society based on renewable energy shows what's possible:
But the resistance to these changes is coming strongest from those
with a vested interest in the status quo. With most focus on the
behavior of the fossil fuel companies themselves, the idea that
utility companies will be deeply impacted by this green energy
revolution is often overlooked.
Earlier this summer, David Roberts, an energy and environmental
blogger at Grist.org, wrote an extensive, multi-part series on the
role of utilities in the renewable energy transition, explaining why
understanding the politics and economics of the utility industry
(despite the grand "tedium" of the task) would be essential for the
remainder of the 21st century. Roberts wrote:
There's very little public discussion of utilities or utility
regulations, especially relative to sexier topics like fracking or
electric cars. That's mainly because the subject is excruciatingly
boring, a thicket of obscure institutions and processes, opaque
jargon, and acronyms out the wazoo. Whether PURPA allows IOUs to
customize RFPs for low-carbon QFs is actually quite important, but
you, dear reader, don't know it, because you fell asleep halfway
through this sentence. Utilities are shielded by a force field of
tedium.
It's is an unfortunate state of affairs, because this is going to be
the century of electricity. Everything that can be electrified will
be. (This point calls for its own post, but mark my words:
transportation, heat, even lots of industrial work is going to shift
to electricity.) So the question of how best to manage electricity
is key to both economic competitiveness and ecological
sustainability.
_______________________________________________
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel