On Thursday 04 November 2004 16.24, Robin Berjon wrote: >Ronan: I don't see what you find wrong with SVGTimer, it's just a >standardisation of ad hoc methods that already exist, minus their flaws >and plus coherent design -- nothing special, and almost no extra work >for implementers.
I find nothing *wrong* with SVGTinmer. I simply question whether this can be done fast enough alerady, and whether it is necessary to add into the specification requirements that are already met outside. Sometimes I wonder if people ask for particular requirements because they/we are too lazy to find a way with the existing tools. The speed issue certainly makes sense and may be a good enough reason to implement SVGTimer given that it will be needed quite a bit. Ronan -- Ronan Oger http://www.roasp.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/1U_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
