Antoine Quint wrote: > Obviously this article is speculative, but I think the writer is spot > on when he makes the difference between "Flash the ecosystem" and the > Flash SWF format, which could be replaced by SVG Tiny without major > changes to the many users of the Flash ecosystem.
I don't see a way that someone could persuade themselves that SVG-Tiny duplicates the range of SWF functionality...? Rick Bullotta wrote: > Good stuff, Antoine. Let's hope it is true...question is, why isn't > this type of information "front and center" on Adobe's market > positioning? Either they need a new marketing team or there's more to > the story... I have not seen any citation of any such Adobe source statement. All we see is an anonymously-written article in The Guardian, citing unnamed Adobe staffers, in the following line: "Adobe staff at Code Camp, Orange's recent developer conference, spoke about moving the mobile version of Flash to the mobile-friendly version of SVG, called SVG-t." Web searches on terms like "'code camp' orange adobe flash svg" do not turn up meaningful results. So far, this may be an accurate rumor of what someone said somewhere, but the pattern of citation suggests that it is not. A follow-up source citation would be useful for any further discussion, agreed...? jd -- John Dowdell . Macromedia Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA Weblog: http://www.macromedia.com/go/blog_jd Aggregator: http://www.macromedia.com/go/weblogs Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
