--- In [email protected], Chris Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JW> The descriptions you gave sounded like they were most likely the result of > JW> bugs to me, not missing functuality. > > I agree there is no point sending in a bug like "there is no smil > animations support". They know, and there already is such a bug.
Are there? For every unimplemented feature? If so, then I think it would be tremendously useful if all SVG bugs of the type "Firefox does not implement SVG Feature XYZ" were mentioned in the Mozilla SVG pages here: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG_in_Firefox_1.5 and http://www.mozilla.org/projects/svg/status.html. These pages are wikis so anyone can do this. In this way, people can browse to the bug and vote for it -> one mechanism that shows demand for features... or if they're familiar with it, they can supply patches. Identification of these "missing functionality" bugs in both wiki pages would be great. Bugs that deal with broken aspects of implemented SVG features (like Bug 300868: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300868) also need to be mentioned for the same reasons. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/1U_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
