Hi Lance,
[email protected] wrote on 05/11/2006 02:03:58 PM:
> > you can combine like this
> > <rect style="transform="translate(8,48)" .... X1 xxx>
> However, it also makes for a lot of redundant attributes, or deeply
> nested groups. I don't like that, but I guess there is no way around
> that at this time?
I don't see any "extra" redundancy SVG's way:
<g ....>
<rect transform="translate(1,1)" ...>
<rect transform="translate(2,2)" ...>
</g>
Your way:
<g ....>
<set transform="translate(1,1)"/>
<rect ...>
<set transform="translate(2,2)"/>
<rect ...>
</g>
It looks to me like your way has this extra "wasted" 'set' element.
> to reset the attribute at the time of processing; and even make the
> set implicit to g="current" so I don't have to refer to it as that is
> the deepest context anyways. Otherwise, svg gets verbose and redundant.
I beg to differ, I'll admit that trying to nest your g elements isn't
that nice, but just setting the transform on the rects is very concise
and avoids a lot of issues like just what is the userspace of the g
if you can change it in the middle of the children list...
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/1U_rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my
membership"
----
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
