Hi Lance, svg-developers@yahoogroups.com wrote on 05/11/2006 02:03:58 PM:
> > you can combine like this > > <rect style="transform="translate(8,48)" .... X1 xxx> > However, it also makes for a lot of redundant attributes, or deeply > nested groups. I don't like that, but I guess there is no way around > that at this time? I don't see any "extra" redundancy SVG's way: <g ....> <rect transform="translate(1,1)" ...> <rect transform="translate(2,2)" ...> </g> Your way: <g ....> <set transform="translate(1,1)"/> <rect ...> <set transform="translate(2,2)"/> <rect ...> </g> It looks to me like your way has this extra "wasted" 'set' element. > to reset the attribute at the time of processing; and even make the > set implicit to g="current" so I don't have to refer to it as that is > the deepest context anyways. Otherwise, svg gets verbose and redundant. I beg to differ, I'll admit that trying to nest your g elements isn't that nice, but just setting the transform on the rects is very concise and avoids a lot of issues like just what is the userspace of the g if you can change it in the middle of the children list... ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how. http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/1U_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/