At 10:56 AM 5/9/2007, Jon Ferraoilo wrote:

>Microsoft would be making a mistake if they support SVG via some
>transformation hack that converts SVG markup into underlying WPF markup.

I agree, but the cool thing about Sam Ruby's demonstration* to me, is 
that it sorta suggests that support for SVG by Microsoft would not be 
too difficult to attain.

Perhaps when they decide it is time to support SVG, they can just 
flip a switch somewhere in their Silverlight plugin and the happy 
bits will flow from the svigot (sp?). Maybe it's just that no one has 
spoken the magic word yet.

I'd guess, though, that it might take a while to get the graphics and 
animation engines you mention up to snuff? Maybe IBM could lend them 
one? It might be a fitting payback for back when Microsoft lent DOS 
to IBM. I'll bet Adobe might have some unused code sitting on a shelf 
somewhere.

David**

* A funner demonstration would be to do the inverse of what Sam is 
doing: serialize a Silverlight doc, convert to SVG, then render using 
the ASV plugin. The Silverlight would probably load a lot faster 
then, making everyone happy.

**Not to be taken seriously, please. I use an irony board to flatten 
all my unknown tags. 



-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my 
membership"
---- 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to