On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:31:55AM +0100, John Delacour wrote:
> At 10:17 +0530 20/10/11, Raks A wrote:
>
> >...But the more I read about CSS3 animations it seems to be able to do almost
> >everything that SVG is capable of And its been hard to convince
> >people to use SVG
>
> To me the whole point of SVG is that it is what it says -- SCALABLE,
> VECTOR graphics. The fact that you can perform certain animations on
> raster images within SVG is beside the point.
>
> SVG is uniquely powerful for the purposes for which I have always
> presumed it was devised, namely to enable the production of
> (infinitely) scalable vector images. The ability to include raster
> elements within SVG is a feature hardly worth noting.
>
> The more I read of other people's uses of SVG, mainly generated by a
> variety of "painting" programmes, the more I think SVG will go
> nowhere until power users begin to harness its real power as a vector
> drafting tool.
.
.
.
Please say a few words more, Mr. Delacour.
I mildly agree with you--but I suspect we might see different
pictures when we use the same words. What, for you, is the
significance among end-users of scalable images? What's the
"business case" you see for vector, as opposed to raster,
graphics?
For me, SVG has already gone more-than-nowhere.
------------------------------------
-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [email protected]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my
membership"
----Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
