On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:32:04PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:19:44 +0000 (UTC) > Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Author: jfv > > Date: Thu Nov 27 02:19:44 2008 > > New Revision: 185356 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/185356 > > > > Log: > > Small nit I just noticed, a pre-decrement should be post. > > > > Modified: > > head/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c > > > > Modified: head/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c Thu Nov 27 02:18:43 2008 > > (r185355) +++ head/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c Thu Nov 27 02:19:44 > > 2008 (r185356) @@ -3244,7 +3244,7 @@ fail: > > * the rings that completed, the failing case will have > > * cleaned up for itself. 'j' failed, so its the terminus. > > */ > > - for (int i = 0; i < j; ++i) { > > + for (int i = 0; i < j; i++) { > > rxr = &adapter->rx_rings[i]; > > for (int n = 0; n < adapter->num_rx_desc; n++) { > > struct ixgbe_rx_buf *rxbuf; > > Is C99 construct here intentional? If so, when did we agree on using > only C99 compilers on our code base?
kernel has been compiling with c99 for a long time now. World is still c89 but compiles cleanly as c99 as of a few days ago (the zfs update + the sendmail fix) I did not test that the world compiles to a correct code using c99 but I am going to work on that soon. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
