Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > > For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size, > > which can be done later, just > > to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could > > cause a panic. > > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs > threads do request larger stack size, I know this. > > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which > does not boot ?
Will do. Fabian
pgpt2I4xSvy93.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
