Fabian Keil <freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de> wrote: > Fabian Keil <freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de> wrote: > > > Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > > > > For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size, > > > > which can be done later, just > > > > to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could > > > > cause a panic. > > > > > > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing > > > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs > > > threads do request larger stack size, I know this. > > > > > > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which > > > does not boot ? > > > > Will do. > > With the patch I was able to boot from a three-disk raidz1 > pool without having to set KSTACK_PAGES=4:
I didn't notice any problems with single-disk, mirror and raidz2 root pools either. Fabian
pgpql0yeCkQol.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
