On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 06:56 -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > > Hi Devin, > > > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:33:39 -0800 > > Devin Teske <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2017, at 11:15 PM, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-11-22 17:38, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 15:27 +0000, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > > Author: manu > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 22 15:27:47 2017 > > > > > > New Revision: 326095 > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/326095 > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > bsdinstall: Add ntpdate option > > > > > > > > > > > > When you install a computer for the first time, the date in the > > > > > > CMOS sometimes > > > > > > not accurate and you need to ntpdate as ntpd will fail a the time > > > > > > difference > > > > > > is too big. > > > > > > Add an option in bsdinstall to enable ntpdate that will do that > > > > > > for us. > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed by: allanjude > > > > > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13149 > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > > head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/scripts/services > > > > > > Modified: head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/scripts/services > > > > > > ============================================================================== > > > > > > --- head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/scripts/services Wed Nov 22 > > > > > > 15:18:11 2017 (r326094) > > > > > > +++ head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/scripts/services Wed Nov 22 > > > > > > 15:27:47 2017 (r326095) > > > > > > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ DAEMONS=$( dialog --backtitle "FreeBSD Installer" > > > > > > \ > > > > > > local_unbound "Local caching validating resolver" > > > > > > ${local_unbound:-off} \ > > > > > > sshd "Secure shell daemon" ${sshd_enable:-off} \ > > > > > > moused "PS/2 mouse pointer on console" > > > > > > ${moused_enable:-off} \ > > > > > > + ntpdate "Synchronize system and network time at bootime" \ > > > > > > + ${ntpdate_enable:-off} \ > > > > > > ntpd "Synchronize system and network time" > > > > > > ${ntpd_enable:-off} \ > > > > > > powerd "Adjust CPU frequency dynamically if supported" \ > > > > > > ${powerd_enable:-off} \ > > > > > The right way to enable a time-step at boot is to set the rc conf > > > > > variable ntpd_sync_on_start to YES. ntpdate has been deprecated for > > > > > *years*. > > > > > -- Ian > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > > > Thanks I didn't know about option -g (nor ntpd_sync_on_start), this > > > > bring a few questions : > > > > > > > > - Is there any reason to not always use -g for ntpd ? As a lambda user > > > > I just want my time to be set, no matter what. > > > > - Should we remove ntpdate in -current before 12 if it's deprecated ? > > > > > > > > I'll make the necessary changes according to your (or others) answers. > > > > > > > I would not remove ntpdate. > I concur, as ntpdate is trivial to use, ntpd -pg requires a proper > /etc/ntp.conf, > though that is trival too you well not get what you want if you do not have > that. > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to make ntpd sync and then quit immediately? > > Just by reading the man I see the -q option which does exactly that. > > Setting both -q and -g should have the same behavior than ntpdate (not > > tested). > ntpd -pg is the preferred method per the ntp.org documentation: > https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate > > > > > > > > > > > If not, sounds like ntpdate serves a purpose not filled by ntpd. > > > > > > Valid case is someone running a VM that gets paused for days, weeks, or > > > even months at a time. On such a VM it may make more sense to let the > > > clock be only sporadically managed in an adhoc manner. > > > > > > I personally like to use ntpdate on said VMs because I generally set a > > > timeout on my ssh-agent in said VMs and by managing the clock manually > > > allows me to better control keys loaded. > > > > > > Pretty sure other people may have other reasons for non-daemonized clock > > > management. > > That's why I asked :) > I think that the ntp distribution still contains ntpdate, so long as that is > true > we should continue to include it in FreeBSD. When/if they remove it from the > official ntp distribution then this issue shall need a revist. >
I tend to agree with this... it's the ntpd project that deprecated ntpdate years ago, but as long as it's included in their distributions, we should include it in ours. But I also think we shouldn't add new uses of it when there are alternatives available. -- Ian _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
