Hi,
>>>>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:10:55 -0800
>>>>> Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> said:
dougb> I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to
dougb> quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and
dougb> simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PATH in the environment
dougb> if we're just going to use 'env -i HOME PATH' anyway?
Yup, your attached patch is equivalent. However, I prefer the
previous one. In anyway, I don't have a strong opinion around here.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
u...@mahoroba.org u...@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
