On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:02:46 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > Author: avg > Date: Wed Sep 15 10:02:46 2010 > New Revision: 212647 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212647 > > Log: > sys/pcpu.h: remove a workaround for a fixed ld bug > > The workaround was incorrectly documented as having something to do with > set_pcpu section's progbits, but in fact it was for incorrect placement > of __start_set_pcpu because of the bug in ld. > The bug was fixed in r210245, see commit message for details. > > A side-effect of the workaround was that a zero-size set_pcpu section was > produced for modules, source code of which included pcpu.h but didn't > actually define any dynamic per-cpu variables. > This commit should remove the side-effect. > > The same workaround is present sys/net/vnet.h, has an analogous side-effect > and can be removed as well. > > An UPDATING entry that warns about a need for recent ld is following. > > MFC after: 1 month > > Modified: > head/sys/sys/pcpu.h > > Modified: head/sys/sys/pcpu.h > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/sys/pcpu.h Wed Sep 15 09:48:18 2010 (r212646) > +++ head/sys/sys/pcpu.h Wed Sep 15 10:02:46 2010 (r212647) > @@ -44,24 +44,10 @@ > > /* > * Define a set for pcpu data. > - * > - * We don't use SET_DECLARE because it defines the set as 'a' when we > - * want 'aw'. gcc considers uninitialized data in a separate section > - * writable, and there is no generic zero initializer that works for > - * structs and scalars. > */ > extern uintptr_t *__start_set_pcpu; > extern uintptr_t *__stop_set_pcpu;
Given that you removed this comment, can you now use SET_DECLARE() here? -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
