On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:42:40 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 15/09/2010 19:30 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > SET_DECLARE would expand to exactly those two lines. > > I am not sure why comment even said that it's impossible to use > > SET_DECLARE(), > > perhaps previously it used to expand to something bigger? > > Having said that, I am not sure if it makes logical sense to use > SET_DECLARE() in > pcpu.h. Family of SET_* macros seems to be geared towards sets that contain > arrays of identical items (e.g. see SET_ITEM, SET_COUNT). set_pcpu reserves > space > for items of various types and sizes. So I am not sure if using any SET_* > macros > would not be confusing in the future. > > What do you think?
Hmm, you could use SET_START() and SET_LIMIT() at least, but it's not a big deal either way. The comment seemed to imply that it would have used SET_DECLARE() if there had not been technical difficulties. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
