On 29/03/2015 22:52, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 30.03.2015 00:44, Steven Hartland wrote:
Given the upstream nature of this code it may be better to not do
cosmetic changes like unless they are first upstreamed as it makes
comparing with the upstream when bringing update harder.
My changes didn't move the code away from the upstream, may be even made
it a bit closer. In places where upstream code has "64 << 20", I changed
our code from "64<<18" to "16 << 20", which I believe both more correct
and closer to upstream.
Cool thanks for clarifying, sounds like we might need a pass over things
to see if we can bring
in any other changes which may have slipped though the net.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"