-----Original Message----- > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Ian Lepore > <[email protected]> > Date: 2016-12-19, Monday at 11:20 > To: Warner Losh <[email protected]>, Ravi Pokala <[email protected]> > Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau <[email protected]>, Dimitry Andric > <[email protected]>, src-committers <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r310171 - head/sys/sys > > On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 11:58 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Are there other precedence for avoiding the SCN macros in the tree as >> well, or is this new art? >> >> Warner > > There was another commit recently the fixed the same kind of scanf > error by making the variable fit the scanf type (changing uint64_t to > an explicit long long unsigned, iirc). I don't know if that alone > counts as a precedent, but IMO it's a more palatible fix than the > SCN/PRI ugliness.
With all apologies to Churchill, SCN/PRI are the worst way to address this in a machine-independent way, except for all the other ways that have been tried from time to time. :-P -Ravi (rpokala@) > -- Ian _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
