On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 6:28 pm, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Madan U S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do the 'svnmerge integrated' and 'svnmerge avail' commands require
>
> a
>
> > head option(in case the branch is tracked against more than one other
> > branch)?
> >
> > Why cant it list the integrated and available options against all
> > heads available?
>
> "avail" is a remote operation that can take even several minutes on large
> repositories, so I don't think we should be slower by default.
> "integrated" is a local opeartion, so it'd make more sense, but there is a
> consistency issue then.
you know, what we need is 'svnmerge status'!!!
Regards,
Madan.
_______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
