Madan U S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> you know, what we need is 'svnmerge status'!!! > > 'svnmerge status' should list the following... > > /branches/branch1: > r8-12: Merged by username on date at r13 > r15: Merged by username on date at r18 > r16: Hand merged by username on date at r19 > > Empty revisions on /branches/branch1: r6-7,r13, r18-19 > Unmerged revisions on /branches/branch1: r21-22, r24, r26 > > /branches/branch2: > r6: Merged by username on date at r7 > r14: Hand merged by username on date at r20 > > Empty revisions on /branches/branch2: r7-13, r15-16, r18-20 > Unmerged revisions on /branches/branch2: r23, r25 > > > Have I missed something here? (maybe blocked revisions should be listed > here too :?
This is more a "svnmerge log", given that it goes through history. I have been thinking of "svnmerge log" for a long time and I believe it would indeed be an useful feature. We also have much infrastructure in place (like, detecting the revisions at which the svnmerge-integrated property was changed). -- Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
