On 7/10/2007 4:50 PM, Raman Gupta wrote: > Thanks Michael. Rich's related patch is here: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.svnmerge.devel/310
I reviewed this patch and it is OK to commit it. There were some comments to unify it to my patch to not show block revisions in bidirectional merges, but I disagree with that, as they need different codepaths anyway. I would *love* if someone wrote a testcase for this though. > Rich also submitted another patch, but he got some feedback and never > re-submitted... see this message and associated thread: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.svnmerge.devel/277 > > Maybe Rich or someone else with the inclination could pick up where > this left off? If somebody does, please address my previous review in that thread. Then explicitally CC me on the patch submission and I will do the review. Thanks! -- Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
