Giovanni Bajo wrote: >> Thanks Michael. Rich's related patch is here: >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.svnmerge.devel/310 > > I reviewed this patch and it is OK to commit it. There were some > comments to unify it to my patch to not show block revisions in > bidirectional merges, but I disagree with that, as they need different > codepaths anyway. > > I would *love* if someone wrote a testcase for this though.
Ok, I've produced a new diff against the current svn trunk and will see if I can put a testcase together for this before I put it on the tracker. -- Michael Willmott _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
