Hi Dustin, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > This patch passes all of the tests, although the python could be > tightened up a little bit, and I don't like the unnecessary print:
Yep, I noticed that and have re-sent an enhanced patch. > Finally, I'm not sure why this only applies to "avail", and not > "merge" -- in fact, why not to all commands? Clearly I'm missing > something. My understanding is that for a merge, you absolutely need a working copy because you need to queue up the different SVN operations involved in the merge. If you didn't, then you would have to make non-atomic commits of the property changes separate from checking in the actual file changes. HTH, Shaddy _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
