On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Shaddy Baddah
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding is that for a merge, you absolutely need a working copy
> because you need to queue up the different SVN operations involved in the
> merge. If you didn't, then you would have to make non-atomic commits of the
> property changes separate from checking in the actual file changes.
But none of those changes happen in the branch_dir -- they all happen
in the current ("trunk") directory.
Right? I know I'm still missing something.
Your new patch looks better, but:
Why cast cmd to a string?
Do all versions of 'svn info' produce the 'Node Kind' key? Can you
check has_key first?
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
_______________________________________________
Svnmerge mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
