| From: Antony Antony <[email protected]> coverity-detected anomalies are sometimes subtle. So I looked at this code and found a couple of bugs. I also did some tidying. But no testing!
Aviv, Antony: please have a look at commit f7aaa80198851ef71da4be8dc54e816f7064e29a Note: % 31 is almost never correct. I think that in this code, + 31 is also wrong. Could someone with real hardware test this code? I cannot see that the old code would use NIC offload since the test for the feature seemed to be backwards. Of course I could be backwards. Knuth said: Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct. I haven't even proved these changes. _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
